Misconceptions In Passive Investment
There’s a huge amount of false information that has been circulating regarding active and passive investment. As a matter of fact, it stirs a lot of debate to many for quite some time. Aside from that, there is also much on the line from salaries of fund managers to retiree’s savings. What seems to be unfortunate here is that, it isn’t possible to try other available investment opportunities by investors. Instead, choosing a strategy has to do with great deal of analysis and research. Whether you lean passive or active, it is vital that you recognize the facts from fiction to be able to come up with a well informed decision on how you can invest your hard earned money in the best way possible.
Here are the facts that need to be cleared up when it comes to passive investment to help refine the debate between the two subjects.
Number 1. There is no action – if just passive investing was as simple as placing money in index fund and wait for all money to roll in. Well the truth is, passive investors can actually be performers of portfolio observation, discipline and construction.
When developing a portfolio together with passive investments similar to index funds, the action begins by allocating money strategically among varieties of asset classes that can help in achieving long term financial goal. If those allocations change, more action is to be found with the passive investor particularly to those who rebalance their portfolio diligently by making trades return to assets back in their original level.
Number 2. Passive investing attains returns that are below market averages – yes this is true mainly because of the cost but, average returns are in eye of investors. Index funds are seeking to replicate market index so even if they do accurately, it will still be below average for the net of fees. On the other hand, index funds normally have lower costs compared to active funds meaning, they have better probabilities of getting near market averages for a long period of time.
In addition to that, active funds charge higher fees for personnel to carry out research and trades which eats away at returns as well as contribute to abysmal historical record to match or beat market averages.
Number 3. Passive investing is deemed as cookie-cutter strategy – due to the reason that passive investment is not managed tactfully to change with market swings or to take advantage of future events, many detractors of it believe that it can’t beat active investment. The truth is, the same strategy may be applied from different investors which is one notable benefit of passive investing.
Refer to: additional resources